As it has moved into the spotlight, however, its value and application have been diminished when used in the wrong context. For many years, serious custodians of classic cars have quietly respected this special type of wear. Whatever the case, we feel there are philosophical and perhaps even ethical implications that should be considered when dealing with patina. Is it recognition that cars are driving machines-not sculptures on rolling pedestals-and should rightly sport some wear and a few road rashes? Is it an indicator that car collecting has “grown up” to become an established and respected hobby, like collecting fine art or furniture, in which original pieces garner more value than restored ones? Is this obsession a subtle backlash to the over-restorations many cars have received in recent years? Soon after these explanations are offered, our questions start pouring out in response. The value is in the patina, they say, or in the provenance that it symbolizes. Worn examples of automobiles are occasionally achieving higher prices than their restored counterparts-ones in significantly better condition. Please submit your car.To be honest, we can’t quite figure out the classic car world’s recent fascination with patina. We have seen many examples that would be allowed. Even though lots of the car has been resprayed over the years, it would still be mostly original. However, the top has never been repainted and the seats are original.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |